The paper characterizes a five-attack space for AI-agent insurance and proves joint incentive compatibility by adding common-control aggregation, interface escalation fees, and model-identity menus to a base runtime, plus a two-parameter premium family.
Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agents
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Prior work on trustworthy AI emphasizes model-internal properties such as bias mitigation, adversarial robustness, and interpretability. As AI systems evolve into autonomous agents deployed in open environments and increasingly connected to payments or assets, the operational meaning of trust shifts to end-to-end outcomes: whether an agent completes tasks, follows user intent, and avoids failures that cause material or psychological harm. These risks are fundamentally product-level and cannot be eliminated by technical safeguards alone because agent behavior is inherently stochastic. To address this gap between model-level reliability and user-facing assurance, we propose a complementary framework based on risk management. Drawing inspiration from financial underwriting, we introduce the \textbf{Agentic Risk Standard (ARS)}, a payment settlement standard for AI-mediated transactions. ARS integrates risk assessment, underwriting, and compensation into a single transaction framework that protects users when interacting with agents. Under ARS, users receive predefined and contractually enforceable compensation in cases of execution failure, misalignment, or unintended outcomes. This shifts trust from an implicit expectation about model behavior to an explicit, measurable, and enforceable product guarantee. We also present a simulation study analyzing the social benefits of applying ARS to agentic transactions. ARS's implementation can be found at https://github.com/t54-labs/AgenticRiskStandard.
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Proposes a time-consistent counterfactual actuarial runtime for AI agents establishing four structural results on toll definition, no-splitting boundaries, authority premiums, and runtime gating.
Introduces a deterministic runtime contract and authority frontier primitive for pricing and gating side-effect actions of AI agents, with empirical instantiation across four environments showing domain-specific reserve requirements.
citing papers explorer
-
Gaming-Resistant Insurance Contracts for Autonomous AI Agents: Strategy-Proof Toll Mechanism Design
The paper characterizes a five-attack space for AI-agent insurance and proves joint incentive compatibility by adding common-control aggregation, interface escalation fees, and model-identity menus to a base runtime, plus a two-parameter premium family.
-
Foundations of a Time-Consistent Counterfactual Actuarial Runtime for Autonomous AI Agents
Proposes a time-consistent counterfactual actuarial runtime for AI agents establishing four structural results on toll definition, no-splitting boundaries, authority premiums, and runtime gating.
-
Insuring Every Action: An Authority Frontier Framework for Runtime Actuarial Control of Autonomous AI Agents
Introduces a deterministic runtime contract and authority frontier primitive for pricing and gating side-effect actions of AI agents, with empirical instantiation across four environments showing domain-specific reserve requirements.