pith. sign in

Average opacity calculation for core-collapse supernovae

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Supernovae (SNe) are among the most intensely studied objects of modern astrophysics, but due to their complex physical nature, theoretical models are essential to understand better these exploding stars, as well as the properties of the variation of the emitted radiation. One possibility for modeling SNe light curves is the construction of a simplified semi-analytic model, which can be used for getting order-of magnitude estimates of the SN properties. One of the strongest simplification in most of these light curve models is the assumption of the constant Thomson-scattering opacity that can be determined as the average opacity of the ejecta. Here we present a systematic analysis for estimating the average opacity in different types of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) that can be used as the constant opacity of the ejecta in simplified semi-analytic models. To use these average opacities self-consistently during light curve (LC) fit we estimate their values from hydrodynamic simulations. In this analysis we first generate MESA (Paxton et al. 2011, 2013, 2015, 2018) stellar models with different physical parameters (initial mass, metallicity, rotation), which determine the mass-loss history of the model star. Then we synthesize SN LCs from these models with the SNEC hydrodynamic code (Morozova et al. 2015) and calculate the Rosseland mean opacity in every mass element. Finally, we compute the average opacities by integrating these Rosseland mean opacities. As a result we find that the average opacities from our calculations show adequate agreement with the opacities generally used in previous studies.

fields

astro-ph.HE 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Signatures of $^{56}$Ni Mixing and Neutron-rich Ejecta in Supernovae

astro-ph.HE · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Multi-shell modeling shows outward 56Ni mixing produces faster brighter rises and biases one-zone fits to lower ejecta mass and higher nickel fraction, while r-process signatures in collapsars depend on placement, distribution, and viewing angle rather than always showing NIR excess.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Signatures of $^{56}$Ni Mixing and Neutron-rich Ejecta in Supernovae astro-ph.HE · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · none · ref 16 · internal anchor

    Multi-shell modeling shows outward 56Ni mixing produces faster brighter rises and biases one-zone fits to lower ejecta mass and higher nickel fraction, while r-process signatures in collapsars depend on placement, distribution, and viewing angle rather than always showing NIR excess.