Sample difficulty in RLVR shows non-monotonic effects on LLM reasoning, with easy/medium problems strengthening computation and reasoning features while hard problems often yield weak or harmful signals.
P^2O: Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) enhances Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning but suffers from advantage collapse on ``hard samples'' where all rollouts fail. This lack of variance eliminates crucial learning signals. For these intractable samples, simply scaling up rollout budgets offers limited gains. We introduce Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization (P$^2$O) to mitigate this collapse by alternating continuous policy updates with discrete prompt evolution. P$^2$O leverages the GEPA algorithm to discover successful reasoning prompts for intractable instances. Via context distillation, the model internalizes these prompt-induced gains directly into its parameters, removing the need for inference-time prompting. Empirically, P$^2$O restores critical advantage signals, significantly outperforming standard GRPO and surpassing baselines with doubled rollout budgets, ultimately yielding strong out-of-distribution generalization and an up to $9.5\%$ performance improvement. Our findings expose the limits of standard exploration in sparse-reward environments, illuminating the potential of unifying evolutionary algorithms with reinforcement learning. This integration of discrete semantic search and continuous parameter updates establishes a self-reinforcing paradigm for autonomous LLM alignment.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Mechanistically Interpreting the Role of Sample Difficulty in RLVR for LLMs
Sample difficulty in RLVR shows non-monotonic effects on LLM reasoning, with easy/medium problems strengthening computation and reasoning features while hard problems often yield weak or harmful signals.