Current LVLM benchmarks overestimate capabilities because many questions can be answered without images due to design flaws or data leakage; MMStar is a human-curated set of 1,500 vision-indispensable samples across 6 capabilities and 18 axes with new metrics for leakage and true multi-modal gain.
Cheap and quick: Efficient vision- language instruction tuning for large language models
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CV 3representative citing papers
A new 1.2M-caption dataset generated via GPT-4V improves LMMs on MME and MMBench by 222.8/22.0/22.3 and 2.7/1.3/1.5 points respectively when used for supervised fine-tuning.
MME is a manually annotated benchmark evaluating MLLMs on perception and cognition across 14 subtasks to avoid data leakage and support fair model comparisons.
citing papers explorer
-
Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?
Current LVLM benchmarks overestimate capabilities because many questions can be answered without images due to design flaws or data leakage; MMStar is a human-curated set of 1,500 vision-indispensable samples across 6 capabilities and 18 axes with new metrics for leakage and true multi-modal gain.
-
ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captions
A new 1.2M-caption dataset generated via GPT-4V improves LMMs on MME and MMBench by 222.8/22.0/22.3 and 2.7/1.3/1.5 points respectively when used for supervised fine-tuning.
-
MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
MME is a manually annotated benchmark evaluating MLLMs on perception and cognition across 14 subtasks to avoid data leakage and support fair model comparisons.