A mapping of 56 studies reveals two parallel but disconnected pathways in human-centered requirements engineering, with the absence of translation mechanisms between human-centered artifacts and formal specifications as the primary structural gap.
Kitchenham, Procedures for performing systematic reviews, Keele, UK, Keele University 33 (2004) (2004) 1–26
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
A systematic literature review of explainability in multimodal attention models finds most studies focus on vision-language tasks with attention-based explanations, but evaluation methods lack consistency and modality-specific considerations.
citing papers explorer
-
Two Integration Pathways in Human-Centered Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study of Structural Gaps
A mapping of 56 studies reveals two parallel but disconnected pathways in human-centered requirements engineering, with the absence of translation mechanisms between human-centered artifacts and formal specifications as the primary structural gap.
-
Decoding the Multimodal Maze: A Systematic Review on the Adoption of Explainability in Multimodal Attention-based Models
A systematic literature review of explainability in multimodal attention models finds most studies focus on vision-language tasks with attention-based explanations, but evaluation methods lack consistency and modality-specific considerations.