The paper derives a Θ(1/√(n log n)) hypothesis testing rate under strategic annotator behavior and shows that high-certainty, format-similar golden questions better reveal annotation quality than standard checks.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04102 , year=
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
Response times modeled as drift-diffusion processes enable consistent estimation of population-average preferences from heterogeneous anonymous binary choices.
Develops self-consistency monitoring for preference annotators and derives sample-complexity bounds showing linear contracts achieve near-ideal performance faster than binary ones under continuous actions.
Introduces a latent user quality model and EM algorithm to infer and filter noisy user-provided pairwise preferences for improved LLM alignment.
citing papers explorer
-
Incentivizing High-Quality Human Annotations with Golden Questions
The paper derives a Θ(1/√(n log n)) hypothesis testing rate under strategic annotator behavior and shows that high-certainty, format-similar golden questions better reveal annotation quality than standard checks.
-
Response Time Enhances Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences
Response times modeled as drift-diffusion processes enable consistent estimation of population-average preferences from heterogeneous anonymous binary choices.
-
How Humans Help LLMs: Assessing and Incentivizing Human Preference Annotators
Develops self-consistency monitoring for preference annotators and derives sample-complexity bounds showing linear contracts achieve near-ideal performance faster than binary ones under continuous actions.
-
Users as Annotators: LLM Preference Learning from Comparison Mode
Introduces a latent user quality model and EM algorithm to infer and filter noisy user-provided pairwise preferences for improved LLM alignment.