pith. sign in

Title resolution pending

· 2026 · DOI 10.1007/978-981-95-7820-7

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
open at publisher browse 1 citing papers

Title metadata for this work has not finished resolving. The hub is built from the citation graph; the title resolver retries DOI and OpenAlex on its next pass.

fields

cs.SE 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Are Performance-Optimization Benchmarks Reliably Measuring Coding Agents?

cs.SE · 2026-07-01 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Audit of GSO, SWE-Perf and SWE-fficiency reveals that reference patches satisfy validity rules across machines for only 39/102, 11/140 and 411/498 tasks respectively, public submissions beat references on 85.3% of replay-valid tasks, and scoring rules cause ranking disagreements.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Are Performance-Optimization Benchmarks Reliably Measuring Coding Agents? cs.SE · 2026-07-01 · unverdicted · none · ref 35

    Audit of GSO, SWE-Perf and SWE-fficiency reveals that reference patches satisfy validity rules across machines for only 39/102, 11/140 and 411/498 tasks respectively, public submissions beat references on 85.3% of replay-valid tasks, and scoring rules cause ranking disagreements.