Relative plausibility theory supplies a computational-level account of comparing explanations against evidence in legal proof, while probabilistic methods supply algorithmic-level implementations, and the two correspond when plausibility judgments meet basic coherence conditions.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
stat.AP 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Relative plausibility versus probabilism: A level-of-analysis error in juridical proof
Relative plausibility theory supplies a computational-level account of comparing explanations against evidence in legal proof, while probabilistic methods supply algorithmic-level implementations, and the two correspond when plausibility judgments meet basic coherence conditions.