pith. sign in

Detecting LLM-written peer reviews.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15772

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1 cs.CR 1

years

2026 1 2025 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide

cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 159

    The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.

  • Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption cs.CR · 2025-10-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 49

    LLM watermarking adoption is limited by misaligned stakeholder incentives; incentive-aligned approaches such as in-context watermarking can enable practical use in targeted domains like education and peer review.