Thinking LLMs achieve ~10 percentage points higher accuracy than non-thinking ones on RewardBench with under 2x compute overhead, outperforming augmentation strategies that cost over 8x more while also showing better bias robustness.
Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge, 2024
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Explicit Reasoning Makes Better Judges: A Systematic Study on Accuracy, Efficiency, and Robustness
Thinking LLMs achieve ~10 percentage points higher accuracy than non-thinking ones on RewardBench with under 2x compute overhead, outperforming augmentation strategies that cost over 8x more while also showing better bias robustness.