New ordered contention resolution schemes achieve approximation ratios of 0.382 (general graphs, patience >=2), 0.432 (no patience), and 0.632 (bipartite unit patience) for offline stochastic matching.
Understanding the Correlation Gap for Matchings
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Given a set of vertices $V$ with $|V| = n$, a weight vector $w \in (\mathbb{R}^+ \cup \{ 0 \})^{\binom{V}{2}}$, and a probability vector $x \in [0, 1]^{\binom{V}{2}}$ in the matching polytope, we study the quantity $\frac{E_{G}[ \nu_w(G)]}{\sum_{(u, v) \in \binom{V}{2}} w_{u, v} x_{u, v}}$ where $G$ is a random graph where each edge $e$ with weight $w_e$ appears with probability $x_e$ independently, and let $\nu_w(G)$ denotes the weight of the maximum matching of $G$. This quantity is closely related to correlation gap and contention resolution schemes, which are important tools in the design of approximation algorithms, algorithmic game theory, and stochastic optimization. We provide lower bounds for the above quantity for general and bipartite graphs, and for weighted and unweighted settings. he best known upper bound is $0.54$ by Karp and Sipser, and the best lower bound is $0.4$. We show that it is at least $0.47$ for unweighted bipartite graphs, at least $0.45$ for weighted bipartite graphs, and at lea st $0.43$ for weighted general graphs. To achieve our results, we construct local distribution schemes on the dual which may be of independent interest.
fields
cs.DS 1years
2021 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via New Ordered Contention Resolution Schemes
New ordered contention resolution schemes achieve approximation ratios of 0.382 (general graphs, patience >=2), 0.432 (no patience), and 0.632 (bipartite unit patience) for offline stochastic matching.