Modulated SPT phases in 1D are classified by H²(G, U(1)_s) and obey LSM-type theorems forbidding symmetric short-range entangled ground states.
Bulmash, Defect Networks for Topological Phases Protected By Modulated Symmetries (2025), arXiv:2508.06604 [cond- mat.str-el]
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Z_N cluster and dipolar-cluster SPT wavefunctions admit closed-form projector, neural, and tensor-product representations that generalize Z_2 constructions and yield a TPS benchmarked against MPS via DMRG.
Spatially modulated symmetries arise from gauging ordinary symmetries under generalized LSM anomalies, with explicit lattice models in 2D and 3D plus field-theoretic descriptions in arbitrary dimensions that connect to higher-group structures.
citing papers explorer
-
Matrix Product States for Modulated Topological Phases: Crystalline Equivalence Principle and Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Constraints
Modulated SPT phases in 1D are classified by H²(G, U(1)_s) and obey LSM-type theorems forbidding symmetric short-range entangled ground states.
-
Projector, Neural, and Tensor-Network Representations of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ Cluster and Dipolar-cluster SPT States
Z_N cluster and dipolar-cluster SPT wavefunctions admit closed-form projector, neural, and tensor-product representations that generalize Z_2 constructions and yield a TPS benchmarked against MPS via DMRG.
-
Modulated symmetries from generalized Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies
Spatially modulated symmetries arise from gauging ordinary symmetries under generalized LSM anomalies, with explicit lattice models in 2D and 3D plus field-theoretic descriptions in arbitrary dimensions that connect to higher-group structures.