Explores value-level and graph-level aggregation in multi-agent value-based argumentation and proposes aggregating rankings extracted from attack relations as a third method.
Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), pp
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
The authors define Deontic Argumentation Theory and introduce a new semantics supporting weak permission, unlike grounded semantics in obligation conflicts.
citing papers explorer
-
Aggregation in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Explores value-level and graph-level aggregation in multi-agent value-based argumentation and proposes aggregating rankings extracted from attack relations as a third method.
-
Deontic Argumentation
The authors define Deontic Argumentation Theory and introduce a new semantics supporting weak permission, unlike grounded semantics in obligation conflicts.