This research-in-progress paper conceptualizes reflective use as an iterative behavioral-knowledge capability in genAI interaction, identified via expert interviews and a focus group and anchored in self-determination theory.
A Survey of AI Reliance , volume=
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3representative citing papers
The paper introduces a foundational framework with definition, architecture, and processes for effective human oversight of AI systems, plus a documentation template and open research challenges.
The research identifies a 'modality gap' and a 'self-blame' phenomenon in blind users' interactions with agentic AI, advocating for non-visual, blame-aware explanation frameworks.
citing papers explorer
-
Conceptualising Reflective Use: Toward A Process Perspective On Human-AI Interaction
This research-in-progress paper conceptualizes reflective use as an iterative behavioral-knowledge capability in genAI interaction, identified via expert interviews and a focus group and anchored in self-determination theory.
-
Keeping an Eye on AI: A Framework for Effective Human Oversight of AI Systems
The paper introduces a foundational framework with definition, architecture, and processes for effective human oversight of AI systems, plus a documentation template and open research challenges.
-
Explainable AI for Blind and Low-Vision Users: Navigating Trust, Modality, and Interpretability in the Agentic Era
The research identifies a 'modality gap' and a 'self-blame' phenomenon in blind users' interactions with agentic AI, advocating for non-visual, blame-aware explanation frameworks.