SGR-Bench evaluates agentic LLM systems on state-gated retrieval tasks where evidence is only accessible after configuring site-specific states, with the strongest system reaching 66.18% item-level F1 and failures dominated by retrieval-scope drift.
Deepwidesearch: Benchmarking depth and width in agentic information seeking
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3representative citing papers
REFLECT benchmark shows current LLM judges achieve below 55% accuracy detecting failures in evidence-based research agents, especially on evidence verification.
Arbor combines a coordinator, executors, and a hypothesis tree to enable cumulative autonomous research, outperforming Codex and Claude Code by over 2.5x on six real tasks and reaching 86.36% Any Medal on MLE-Bench Lite.
citing papers explorer
-
SGR-Bench: Benchmarking Search Agents on State-Gated Retrieval
SGR-Bench evaluates agentic LLM systems on state-gated retrieval tasks where evidence is only accessible after configuring site-specific states, with the strongest system reaching 66.18% item-level F1 and failures dominated by retrieval-scope drift.
-
Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
REFLECT benchmark shows current LLM judges achieve below 55% accuracy detecting failures in evidence-based research agents, especially on evidence verification.
-
Toward Generalist Autonomous Research via Hypothesis-Tree Refinement
Arbor combines a coordinator, executors, and a hypothesis tree to enable cumulative autonomous research, outperforming Codex and Claude Code by over 2.5x on six real tasks and reaching 86.36% Any Medal on MLE-Bench Lite.