LLMs recover only ~20% of explicit pragmatic shifts under implicit cultural cues across five languages, responding mainly to linguistic structure rather than cultural associations as shown by Hindi-Urdu controls.
S ocial CC : Interactive Evaluation for Cultural Competence in Language Agents
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3representative citing papers
Proposes a three-level taxonomy of Cultural Awareness, Cultural Sensitivity, and Cultural Competence for AI evaluation, grounded in intercultural communication scholarship to improve validity in multicultural contexts.
LLM agents display limited alignment with human emotional responses to red tape across cultures, performing worse in Eastern contexts, while cultural prompting offers little improvement.
citing papers explorer
-
Do LLMs Use Cultural Knowledge Without Being Told? A Multilingual Evaluation of Implicit Pragmatic Adaptation
LLMs recover only ~20% of explicit pragmatic shifts under implicit cultural cues across five languages, responding mainly to linguistic structure rather than cultural associations as shown by Hindi-Urdu controls.
-
Defining Cultural Capabilities for AI Evaluation: A Taxonomy Grounded in Intercultural Communication Theory
Proposes a three-level taxonomy of Cultural Awareness, Cultural Sensitivity, and Cultural Competence for AI evaluation, grounded in intercultural communication scholarship to improve validity in multicultural contexts.
-
Cross-Cultural Simulation of Citizen Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape Using LLM Agents
LLM agents display limited alignment with human emotional responses to red tape across cultures, performing worse in Eastern contexts, while cultural prompting offers little improvement.