Context compaction silently drops governance constraints in LLM agents, raising policy violation rates from 0% to 30% on average, with a proposed pinning mitigation restoring compliance.
Parallel Context Compaction for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Serving
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Long-horizon LLM agents accumulate growing conversation histories that eventually exceed the model's context window. Context compaction via LLM-based summarization keeps the conversation bounded, but summarization is inherently lossy and the blocking call stalls agent inference for tens of seconds. Moreover, the operator has no fine-grained control over summary volume since prompt instructions are largely ignored, and as context grows, both the amount of output tokens the model produces and the information it retains fluctuate substantially from run to run, making the agent's retained knowledge unpredictable across runs. We introduce \textbf{parallel compaction} for long-horizon agentic flows and characterize it against the sequential synchronous baseline across four backbones spanning 8B to 120B parameters, mixing dense and MoE architectures with reasoning and non-reasoning models, on the HotpotQA multi-hop QA and LoCoMo long-context dialogue benchmarks. Parallel compaction gives the operator fine-grained, predictable control over summary volume and enables more targeted prompt engineering per block. At matched compaction decode volume, it reduces end-to-end wall time and improves compaction throughput over the sequential baseline.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Governance Decay: How Context Compaction Silently Erases Safety Constraints in Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Context compaction silently drops governance constraints in LLM agents, raising policy violation rates from 0% to 30% on average, with a proposed pinning mitigation restoring compliance.