Under ETH, no f(k) n^{o(k/log k)}-time algorithm can approximate k-permutation pattern counts within n^{(1/2-ε)k} factor, matching exact-counting hardness.
Stanley-Wilf limits are typically exponential
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
For a permutation $\pi$, let $S_{n}(\pi)$ be the number of permutations on $n$ letters avoiding $\pi$. Marcus and Tardos proved the celebrated Stanley-Wilf conjecture that $L(\pi)= \lim_{n \to \infty} S_n(\pi)^{1/n}$ exists and is finite. Backed by numerical evidence, it has been conjectured by many researchers over the years that $L(\pi)=\Theta(k^2)$ for every permutation $\pi$ on $k$ letters. We disprove this conjecture, showing that $L(\pi)=2^{k^{\Theta(1)}}$ for almost all permutations $\pi$ on $k$ letters.
fields
cs.DS 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Inapproximability of Counting Permutation Patterns
Under ETH, no f(k) n^{o(k/log k)}-time algorithm can approximate k-permutation pattern counts within n^{(1/2-ε)k} factor, matching exact-counting hardness.