LLMs predict outcomes of real scientific experiments at 14-26% accuracy, comparable to human experts, but lack calibration on prediction reliability while humans demonstrate strong calibration.
Do large language models know what they don’t know? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18153,
6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
6
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 3
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 3representative citing papers
Clarification-seeking in LLM agents amplifies prompt injection attack success from ~2% to over 30% across ten frontier models in a new 728-scenario benchmark.
LLMs show measurable self-recognition that linearly correlates with self-preference bias in evaluations, supported by fine-tuning experiments and controls for confounders.
AVA is a specialized GenAI platform for development policy research that provides verifiable syntheses from World Bank reports and is associated with 2.4-3.9 hours of weekly time savings in a large-scale user evaluation.
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt utility.
citing papers explorer
-
SciPredict: Can LLMs Predict the Outcomes of Scientific Experiments in Natural Sciences?
LLMs predict outcomes of real scientific experiments at 14-26% accuracy, comparable to human experts, but lack calibration on prediction reliability while humans demonstrate strong calibration.
-
ASPI: Seeking Ambiguity Clarification Amplifies Prompt Injection Vulnerability in LLM Agents
Clarification-seeking in LLM agents amplifies prompt injection attack success from ~2% to over 30% across ten frontier models in a new 728-scenario benchmark.
-
LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations
LLMs show measurable self-recognition that linearly correlates with self-preference bias in evaluations, supported by fine-tuning experiments and controls for confounders.
-
Learning from AVA: Early Lessons from a Curated and Trustworthy Generative AI for Policy and Development Research
AVA is a specialized GenAI platform for development policy research that provides verifiable syntheses from World Bank reports and is associated with 2.4-3.9 hours of weekly time savings in a large-scale user evaluation.
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt utility.
- Look-Closer-Then-Diagnose: Confidence-Aware Ultrasound VQA via Active Zooming