pith. sign in

A comprehensive taxonomy for explainable artificial intelligence: a systematic survey of surveys on methods and concepts.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 38:3043–3101

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 3

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Benchmarking Sensor-Fault Robustness in Forecasting

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · conditional · novelty 7.0

SensorFault-Bench is a new CPS-grounded benchmark showing that clean-MSE rankings of forecasting models often disagree with their robustness under standardized sensor-fault scenarios across four real datasets.

IViT: A Novel Interpretable Visual Transformer for Skin Disease Detection

eess.IV · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

IViT applies quadratic programming to a pre-trained Vision Transformer with a multi-objective loss, achieving 93.80% accuracy on six skin disease datasets (0.21% below baseline) while reducing feature redundancy by 29.5% and producing clinically consistent activations.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • Benchmarking Sensor-Fault Robustness in Forecasting cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · conditional · none · ref 90

    SensorFault-Bench is a new CPS-grounded benchmark showing that clean-MSE rankings of forecasting models often disagree with their robustness under standardized sensor-fault scenarios across four real datasets.

  • Consistency Training while Mitigating Obfuscation via Rate Matching cs.CL · 2026-06-01 · unverdicted · none · ref 172

    RMCT matches the rate of target behaviors like bias-following across input perturbations to reduce sycophancy in LLMs while preserving verbalization of bias cues.

  • IViT: A Novel Interpretable Visual Transformer for Skin Disease Detection eess.IV · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · none · ref 36

    IViT applies quadratic programming to a pre-trained Vision Transformer with a multi-objective loss, achieving 93.80% accuracy on six skin disease datasets (0.21% below baseline) while reducing feature redundancy by 29.5% and producing clinically consistent activations.