pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

Towards reasoning in large language models via multi-agent peer review collaboration

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1 baseline 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 2 cs.CL 1

years

2025 2 2024 1

representative citing papers

Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?

cs.AI · 2025-03-17 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

The authors create the first large-scale dataset and taxonomy of failure modes in multi-agent LLM systems to explain their limited performance gains.

Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs

cs.AI · 2025-01-10 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

The survey organizes LLM-based multi-agent collaboration mechanisms into a framework with dimensions of actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols, reviews applications across domains, and identifies challenges for future research.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? cs.AI · 2025-03-17 · unverdicted · none · ref 68

    The authors create the first large-scale dataset and taxonomy of failure modes in multi-agent LLM systems to explain their limited performance gains.

  • Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs cs.AI · 2025-01-10 · unverdicted · none · ref 143

    The survey organizes LLM-based multi-agent collaboration mechanisms into a framework with dimensions of actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols, reviews applications across domains, and identifies challenges for future research.

  • LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods cs.CL · 2024-12-07 · accept · none · ref 270

    A survey that organizes LLMs-as-judges research into functionality, methodology, applications, meta-evaluation, and limitations.