A qualitative study with 22 creative writers finds that the reflective value of AI refusals depends on alignment with users' situational thinking phases, cognitive beliefs, and views of AI roles.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.HC 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
A within-participants study with design students found that sketch inputs to an AI ideation tool increased fluency but students still preferred text prompts, pointing to design choices that could better preserve reflective practice.
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond Compliance: How AI Could Help Creative Writers by Refusing Them
A qualitative study with 22 creative writers finds that the reflective value of AI refusals depends on alignment with users' situational thinking phases, cognitive beliefs, and views of AI roles.
-
Reviving Reflection-in-Action: Instilling Designerly Thinking in AI-Supported Ideation through Multimodal Prompting
A within-participants study with design students found that sketch inputs to an AI ideation tool increased fluency but students still preferred text prompts, pointing to design choices that could better preserve reflective practice.