Automated LLM-based evaluation of code review bot comments achieves only moderate agreement (0.44-0.62) with developer labels in an industrial dataset because developer decisions reflect contextual constraints beyond comment quality.
Can llms replace human evaluators? an empirical study of llm-as-a-judge in software engineering.Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering, 2(IS- STA):1955–1977, June 2025
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.SE 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practice
Automated LLM-based evaluation of code review bot comments achieves only moderate agreement (0.44-0.62) with developer labels in an industrial dataset because developer decisions reflect contextual constraints beyond comment quality.