LLMs show statistical preemption for 120 verb-construction pairs, with surprisal driven by competing-form frequency rather than verb frequency, scaling as a power law with size, and causally shifted by controlled fine-tuning.
This yields r= 0.74 , slightly lower, suggesting that the ratio formulation (which capturesrelative competition) is more informative than the simple proportion
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Do Language Models Know What Not to Say? Causal Evidence for Statistical Preemption in LLMs
LLMs show statistical preemption for 120 verb-construction pairs, with surprisal driven by competing-form frequency rather than verb frequency, scaling as a power law with size, and causally shifted by controlled fine-tuning.