pith. sign in

hub

SealQA: Raising the Bar for Reasoning in Search-Augmented Language Models

11 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

11 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We introduce SealQA, a new challenge benchmark for evaluating SEarch-Augmented Language models on fact-seeking questions where web search yields conflicting, noisy, or unhelpful results. SealQA comes in three flavors: (1) Seal-0 (main) and (2) Seal-Hard, which assess factual accuracy and reasoning capabilities, with Seal-0 focusing on the most challenging questions where chat models (e.g., GPT-4.1) typically achieve near-zero accuracy; and (3) LongSeal, which extends SealQA to test long-context, multi-document reasoning in "needle-in-a-haystack" settings. Our evaluation reveals critical limitations in current models: Even frontier LLMs perform poorly across all SealQA flavors. On Seal-0, frontier agentic models equipped with tools like o3 and o4-mini achieve only 17.1% and 6.3% accuracy, respectively, at their best reasoning efforts. We find that advanced reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1-671B and o3-mini are highly vulnerable to noisy search results. Notably, increasing test-time compute does not yield reliable gains across o3-mini, o4-mini, and o3, with performance often plateauing or even declining early. Additionally, while recent models are less affected by the "lost-in-the-middle" issue, they still fail to reliably identify relevant documents in LongSeal when faced with numerous distractors. To facilitate future work, we release SealQA at huggingface.co/datasets/vtllms/sealqa.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 10 2025 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 11

representative citing papers

Toward Generalist Autonomous Research via Hypothesis-Tree Refinement

cs.CL · 2026-06-10 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Arbor combines a coordinator, executors, and a hypothesis tree to enable cumulative autonomous research, outperforming Codex and Claude Code by over 2.5x on six real tasks and reaching 86.36% Any Medal on MLE-Bench Lite.

Argus: Evidence Assembly for Scalable Deep Research Agents

cs.CL · 2026-05-15 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

Argus coordinates a Navigator and multiple Searchers via an evidence graph for deep research, reporting average gains of 5.5 points with one Searcher and 12.7 points with eight parallel Searchers across eight benchmarks, reaching 86.2 on BrowseComp with 64 Searchers.

ExpSeek: Self-Triggered Experience Seeking for Web Agents

cs.CL · 2026-01-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ExpSeek shifts web agents to self-triggered step-level experience seeking via entropy thresholds, delivering 9.3% and 7.5% absolute gains on Qwen3-8B and 32B models across four benchmarks.

EvoSkill: Automated Skill Discovery for Multi-Agent Systems

cs.AI · 2026-03-03 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

EvoSkill evolves agent skills via failure analysis and Pareto frontier selection, raising exact-match accuracy 7.3% on OfficeQA and 12.1% on SealQA with 5.3% zero-shot transfer to BrowseComp.

Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence

cs.CL · 2026-02-02 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Kimi K2.5 combines joint text-vision training with an Agent Swarm parallel orchestration framework to reach claimed state-of-the-art results on coding, vision, reasoning, and agent tasks while cutting latency up to 4.5 times.

citing papers explorer

Showing 11 of 11 citing papers.