APEX-MEM uses property graphs with temporal events, append-only storage, and an agentic retrieval system to reach 88.88% accuracy on LOCOMO QA and 86.2% on LongMemEval, outperforming prior session-aware methods.
SealQA: Raising the Bar for Reasoning in Search-Augmented Language Models
5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
5
Pith papers citing it
abstract
We introduce SealQA, a new challenge benchmark for evaluating SEarch-Augmented Language models on fact-seeking questions where web search yields conflicting, noisy, or unhelpful results. SealQA comes in three flavors: (1) Seal-0 (main) and (2) Seal-Hard, which assess factual accuracy and reasoning capabilities, with Seal-0 focusing on the most challenging questions where chat models (e.g., GPT-4.1) typically achieve near-zero accuracy; and (3) LongSeal, which extends SealQA to test long-context, multi-document reasoning in "needle-in-a-haystack" settings. Our evaluation reveals critical limitations in current models: Even frontier LLMs perform poorly across all SealQA flavors. On Seal-0, frontier agentic models equipped with tools like o3 and o4-mini achieve only 17.1% and 6.3% accuracy, respectively, at their best reasoning efforts. We find that advanced reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1-671B and o3-mini are highly vulnerable to noisy search results. Notably, increasing test-time compute does not yield reliable gains across o3-mini, o4-mini, and o3, with performance often plateauing or even declining early. Additionally, while recent models are less affected by the "lost-in-the-middle" issue, they still fail to reliably identify relevant documents in LongSeal when faced with numerous distractors. To facilitate future work, we release SealQA at huggingface.co/datasets/vtllms/sealqa.
years
2026 5verdicts
UNVERDICTED 5representative citing papers
A fine-tuning policy trains small language models to search reliably and use evidence, improving multi-hop QA performance by 15-17 points to reach large-model levels.
Tool-augmented LLM reasoning incurs a protocol-induced performance tax that can exceed tool benefits under semantic noise, partially mitigated by a lightweight gate called G-STEP.
Guardian-as-an-Advisor prepends risk labels and explanations from a guardian model to queries, improving LLM safety compliance and reducing over-refusal while adding minimal compute overhead.
Kimi K2.5 combines joint text-vision training with an Agent Swarm parallel orchestration framework to reach claimed state-of-the-art results on coding, vision, reasoning, and agent tasks while cutting latency up to 4.5 times.
citing papers explorer
-
APEX-MEM: Agentic Semi-Structured Memory with Temporal Reasoning for Long-Term Conversational AI
APEX-MEM uses property graphs with temporal events, append-only storage, and an agentic retrieval system to reach 88.88% accuracy on LOCOMO QA and 86.2% on LongMemEval, outperforming prior session-aware methods.
-
Search, Do not Guess: Teaching Small Language Models to Be Effective Search Agents
A fine-tuning policy trains small language models to search reliably and use evidence, improving multi-hop QA performance by 15-17 points to reach large-model levels.
-
Are Tools All We Need? Unveiling the Tool-Use Tax in LLM Agents
Tool-augmented LLM reasoning incurs a protocol-induced performance tax that can exceed tool benefits under semantic noise, partially mitigated by a lightweight gate called G-STEP.
-
Guardian-as-an-Advisor: Advancing Next-Generation Guardian Models for Trustworthy LLMs
Guardian-as-an-Advisor prepends risk labels and explanations from a guardian model to queries, improving LLM safety compliance and reducing over-refusal while adding minimal compute overhead.
-
Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence
Kimi K2.5 combines joint text-vision training with an Agent Swarm parallel orchestration framework to reach claimed state-of-the-art results on coding, vision, reasoning, and agent tasks while cutting latency up to 4.5 times.