GET-2D-1.0 and GET-3D-1.0 grasp planners for the GET asymmetrical gripper achieve over 40% better lift success, shake survival, and force resistance than a bounding-box baseline in physical robot tests.
Learning to Grasp Anything by Playing with Random Toys
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Robotic manipulation policies often struggle to generalize to novel objects, limiting their real-world utility. In contrast, cognitive science suggests that children develop generalizable dexterous manipulation skills by mastering a small set of simple toys and then applying that knowledge to more complex items. Inspired by this, we study if similar generalization capabilities can also be achieved by robots. Our results indicate robots can learn generalizable grasping using randomly assembled objects that are composed from just four shape primitives: spheres, cuboids, cylinders, and rings. We show that training on these "toys" enables robust generalization to real-world objects, yielding strong zero-shot performance. Crucially, we find the key to this generalization is an object-centric visual representation induced by our proposed detection pooling mechanism. Evaluated in both simulation and on physical robots, our model achieves a 67% real-world grasping success rate on the YCB dataset, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches that rely on substantially more in-domain data. We further study how zero-shot generalization performance scales by varying the number and diversity of training toys and the demonstrations per toy. We believe this work offers a promising path to scalable and generalizable learning in robotic manipulation. Demonstration videos, code, checkpoints and our dataset are available on our project page: https://lego-grasp.github.io/ .
fields
cs.RO 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
2D and 3D Grasp Planners for the GET Asymmetrical Gripper
GET-2D-1.0 and GET-3D-1.0 grasp planners for the GET asymmetrical gripper achieve over 40% better lift success, shake survival, and force resistance than a bounding-box baseline in physical robot tests.