An argument paper reframes LLM explainability as an embodied, situated practice based on Dourish and enactivist cognition, identifying ontological obstacles in internal explanations and advocating affordance-based designs.
Minds: extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9 0 (4): 0 465--481, December 2010
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Artifacts in the environment can reduce the memory an RL agent needs to represent its history, as shown by a mathematical proof and experiments with spatial paths.
citing papers explorer
-
Embodied Explainability and Ontological Obstacles: Why We Struggle to Explain the Answers of Large Language Models (LLMs)
An argument paper reframes LLM explainability as an embodied, situated practice based on Dourish and enactivist cognition, identifying ontological obstacles in internal explanations and advocating affordance-based designs.
-
Artifacts as Memory Beyond the Agent Boundary
Artifacts in the environment can reduce the memory an RL agent needs to represent its history, as shown by a mathematical proof and experiments with spatial paths.