LLMs exhibit pseudo-deliberation, with consistent value-action misalignment in generated dialogues despite reasoning, as measured by the new VALDI framework across 4941 scenarios.
Tenenbaum, and Igor Mordatch
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Systematic study of inter-agent communication in LLM multi-agent systems shows reasoning and verification are critical for performance, with a new augmentation technique recovering 86.2% of failures.
AgenticAITA proposes a training-free multi-agent LLM framework for autonomous trading using a deliberative pipeline, Z-score triggers, and safety gates, shown to run correctly in a five-day live dry-run with 157 invocations.
citing papers explorer
-
Pseudo-Deliberation in Language Models: When Reasoning Fails to Align Values and Actions
LLMs exhibit pseudo-deliberation, with consistent value-action misalignment in generated dialogues despite reasoning, as measured by the new VALDI framework across 4941 scenarios.
-
What Do Agents Communicate? Characterizing Information Exchange in Multi-Agent Systems
Systematic study of inter-agent communication in LLM multi-agent systems shows reasoning and verification are critical for performance, with a new augmentation technique recovering 86.2% of failures.
-
AgenticAITA: A Proof-Of-Concept About Deliberative Multi-Agent Reasoning for Autonomous Trading Systems
AgenticAITA proposes a training-free multi-agent LLM framework for autonomous trading using a deliberative pipeline, Z-score triggers, and safety gates, shown to run correctly in a five-day live dry-run with 157 invocations.