LLMs achieve 81% coherent execution simulation on HumanEval but show mostly random or weak consistency across tests, with frontier models relying on natural language shortcuts instead of true program analysis.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Assessing Coherency and Consistency of Code Execution Reasoning by Large Language Models
LLMs achieve 81% coherent execution simulation on HumanEval but show mostly random or weak consistency across tests, with frontier models relying on natural language shortcuts instead of true program analysis.