Preregistered behavioral study identifies a speedup illusion where users overestimate time savings from AI assistance on cognitive tasks despite no actual difference in completion times.
Measuring and mitigating overreliance to build human-compatible AI
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) distinguish themselves from previous technologies by functioning as collaborative ``thought partners,'' capable of engaging more fluidly in natural language on a range of tasks. As LLMs increasingly influence consequential decisions across diverse domains from healthcare to personal advice, the risk of overreliance -- relying on LLMs beyond their capabilities -- grows. This paper argues that measuring and mitigating overreliance must become central to LLM research and deployment. First, we consolidate risks from overreliance at both the individual and societal levels, including high-stakes errors, governance challenges, and cognitive deskilling. Then, we explore LLM characteristics, system design features, and user cognitive biases that together raise serious and unique concerns about overreliance on LLMs in practice. We also examine historical approaches for measuring overreliance, identifying three important gaps and proposing three promising directions to improve measurement. Finally, we propose mitigation strategies that can be pursued to ensure LLMs augment rather than undermine human capabilities.
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 3years
2026 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Three pre-registered studies with 2691 participants show people underestimate their AI usage rate and overestimate efficiency gains on simple tasks, with prior use entrenching further adoption.
Recruiters perceive themselves as retaining agency over GenAI in hiring pipelines, yet GenAI invisibly architects core evaluation inputs, producing only marginal efficiency gains at the cost of deskilling.
citing papers explorer
-
Cognitive offloading and the speedup illusion in human-AI interaction
Preregistered behavioral study identifies a speedup illusion where users overestimate time savings from AI assistance on cognitive tasks despite no actual difference in completion times.
-
The efficiency-gain illusion: People underestimate the rate of AI use and overestimate its benefits on simple tasks
Three pre-registered studies with 2691 participants show people underestimate their AI usage rate and overestimate efficiency gains on simple tasks, with prior use entrenching further adoption.
-
Resume-ing Control: (Mis)Perceptions of Agency Around GenAI Use in Recruiting Workflows
Recruiters perceive themselves as retaining agency over GenAI in hiring pipelines, yet GenAI invisibly architects core evaluation inputs, producing only marginal efficiency gains at the cost of deskilling.