An experiment found LLM counterarguments improved group flexibility and satisfaction while AI mediation boosted minority participation but lowered psychological safety.
APACrefauthors \ 1958
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Anonymous AI relay of minority input in power-imbalanced groups increases participation but reduces psychological safety and satisfaction, while AI-generated autonomous counterarguments improve satisfaction and reduce marginalization.
Empirical analysis of social media discussions shows anti-conformity: individuals match the majority's judgment valence but diverge in stance, with rising persuasive language after group exposure.
citing papers explorer
-
Investigating LLM-Powered Dissenting Minority Support in Power-Imbalanced Group Decision-Making: Counterargument and Mediation as Intervention Strategies
An experiment found LLM counterarguments improved group flexibility and satisfaction while AI mediation boosted minority participation but lowered psychological safety.
-
Rethinking AI-Mediated Minority Support in Power-Imbalanced Group Decision-Making: From Anonymity To Authenticity
Anonymous AI relay of minority input in power-imbalanced groups increases participation but reduces psychological safety and satisfaction, while AI-generated autonomous counterarguments improve satisfaction and reduce marginalization.
-
Influence of the majority group on individual judgments in online spontaneous conversations
Empirical analysis of social media discussions shows anti-conformity: individuals match the majority's judgment valence but diverge in stance, with rising persuasive language after group exposure.