pith. sign in

(2026), Audit Trails for Accountability in Large Language Models

5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

5 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 2

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 5

roles

background 2

polarities

background 1 support 1

representative citing papers

Auditable Agents

cs.AI · 2026-04-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

No agent system can be accountable without auditability, which requires five dimensions (action recoverability, lifecycle coverage, policy checkability, responsibility attribution, evidence integrity) and mechanisms for detect/enforce/recover.

citing papers explorer

Showing 5 of 5 citing papers.

  • Bureaucratic Silences: What the Canadian AI Register Reveals, Omits, and Obscures cs.AI · 2026-04-16 · unverdicted · none · ref 90

    Analysis of Canada's Federal AI Register reveals it frames AI as reliable internal tooling by obscuring sociotechnical elements like human discretion, turning transparency into performative compliance.

  • Auditable Agents cs.AI · 2026-04-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 12

    No agent system can be accountable without auditability, which requires five dimensions (action recoverability, lifecycle coverage, policy checkability, responsibility attribution, evidence integrity) and mechanisms for detect/enforce/recover.

  • Trustworthy Agent Network: Trust in Agent Networks Must Be Baked In, Not Bolted On cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 39

    Argues that trustworthiness in Agent-to-Agent networks requires a new conceptual framework with four design pillars baked in from the beginning, as retrofitting existing single-agent methods is insufficient.

  • Responsible Agentic AI Requires Explicit Provenance cs.AI · 2026-05-16 · unverdicted · none · ref 45

    Explicit provenance across the full agentic AI lifecycle is the necessary condition for making responsibility computable and actionable.

  • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective stat.ML · 2026-04-02 · accept · none · ref 62

    A statistical survey of RLHF for LLM alignment that connects preference learning and policy optimization to models like Bradley-Terry-Luce while reviewing methods, extensions, and open challenges.