Non-English papers face substantially higher rates of negative peer review bias than English-only papers in NLP, with demanding unjustified cross-lingual generalization as the dominant form.
others” implied; list only the named ones. •multilingual-count-only— Only a count given (e.g., “101 languages
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Are Non-English Papers Reviewed Fairly? Language-of-Study Bias in NLP Peer Reviews
Non-English papers face substantially higher rates of negative peer review bias than English-only papers in NLP, with demanding unjustified cross-lingual generalization as the dominant form.