ConflictQA benchmark shows LLMs fail to resolve conflicts between text and KG evidence and often default to one source, motivating the XoT explanation-based reasoning method.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
ARHN refines hard-negative training data for dense retrieval by using LLMs to convert answer-containing passages into additional positives and exclude answer-containing passages from the negative set.
Argues for a denoising-first paradigm in LLM-oriented information retrieval, framing challenges via a four-stage progression and providing a taxonomy of signal-to-noise optimization techniques across the pipeline.
citing papers explorer
-
Exploring Knowledge Conflicts for Faithful LLM Reasoning: Benchmark and Method
ConflictQA benchmark shows LLMs fail to resolve conflicts between text and KG evidence and often default to one source, motivating the XoT explanation-based reasoning method.
-
ARHN: Answer-Centric Relabeling of Hard Negatives with Open-Source LLMs for Dense Retrieval
ARHN refines hard-negative training data for dense retrieval by using LLMs to convert answer-containing passages into additional positives and exclude answer-containing passages from the negative set.
-
LLM-Oriented Information Retrieval: A Denoising-First Perspective
Argues for a denoising-first paradigm in LLM-oriented information retrieval, framing challenges via a four-stage progression and providing a taxonomy of signal-to-noise optimization techniques across the pipeline.