EvalMORAAL evaluates moral alignment of 20 LLMs on World Values Survey and PEW data, reporting high overall correlation with human responses but a 0.21 gap between Western and non-Western regions.
ArXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15145
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
The survey organizes LLM-based multi-agent collaboration mechanisms into a framework with dimensions of actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols, reviews applications across domains, and identifies challenges for future research.
This survey paper identifies opportunities for LLMs in low-resource language humanities research along with challenges in data accessibility, model adaptability, and cultural sensitivity.
citing papers explorer
-
EvalMORAAL: Interpretable Chain-of-Thought and LLM-as-Judge Evaluation for Moral Alignment in Large Language Models
EvalMORAAL evaluates moral alignment of 20 LLMs on World Values Survey and PEW data, reporting high overall correlation with human responses but a 0.21 gap between Western and non-Western regions.
-
Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs
The survey organizes LLM-based multi-agent collaboration mechanisms into a framework with dimensions of actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols, reviews applications across domains, and identifies challenges for future research.
-
Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages in Humanities Research
This survey paper identifies opportunities for LLMs in low-resource language humanities research along with challenges in data accessibility, model adaptability, and cultural sensitivity.