The AI Scientist framework enables LLMs to independently conduct the full scientific process from idea generation to paper writing and review, demonstrated across three ML subfields with papers costing under $15 each.
Model card and evaluations for claude models
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
GAIA benchmark shows humans at 92% accuracy on simple real-world questions far outperform current AI systems at 15%, proposing this gap as a key milestone for general AI.
citing papers explorer
-
The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery
The AI Scientist framework enables LLMs to independently conduct the full scientific process from idea generation to paper writing and review, demonstrated across three ML subfields with papers costing under $15 each.
-
GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants
GAIA benchmark shows humans at 92% accuracy on simple real-world questions far outperform current AI systems at 15%, proposing this gap as a key milestone for general AI.