LLM-based pre-publication idea quality scoring on 6208 economics papers shows execution sets a meritocratic floor, idea quality grades intermediate rungs, and connections provide a bounded advantage mainly at top journals.
arXiv:2502.00070
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Controlled prompt interventions reveal strong affiliation bias in LLM peer reviews favoring top-ranked institutions, plus effects from seniority and publication history.
citing papers explorer
-
Merit or networks? What decides where research is published
LLM-based pre-publication idea quality scoring on 6208 economics papers shows execution sets a meritocratic floor, idea quality grades intermediate rungs, and connections provide a bounded advantage mainly at top journals.
-
Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews
Controlled prompt interventions reveal strong affiliation bias in LLM peer reviews favoring top-ranked institutions, plus effects from seniority and publication history.