LLM-based security code review is vulnerable to framing bias, with a novel iterative refinement attack achieving 100% success in reintroducing vulnerabilities across real projects.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.
citing papers explorer
-
Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
LLM-based security code review is vulnerable to framing bias, with a novel iterative refinement attack achieving 100% success in reintroducing vulnerabilities across real projects.
-
From Trust to Appropriate Reliance: Measurement Constructs in Human-AI Decision-Making
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.
- PrivacyMotiv: Vulnerability-Centered Persona Journeys for Empathic Privacy Reviews in UX Design