Frontier LLMs struggle to discriminate data uncertainty from model uncertainty even when accurate, but a new benchmark and lightweight RL strategy improve attribution without sacrificing answer accuracy.
Do Large Language Models Know What They Don
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
LLMs show a knowing-doing gap in tool use: they often recognize when tools are needed via internal states but fail to translate that into actual tool calls, with mismatches of 26-54% on arithmetic and factual tasks.
LaaB improves LLM hallucination detection by mapping self-judgment labels back into neural feature space and using mutual learning under logical consistency constraints between responses and meta-judgments.
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond "I Don't Know": Evaluating LLM Self-Awareness in Discriminating Data and Model Uncertainty
Frontier LLMs struggle to discriminate data uncertainty from model uncertainty even when accurate, but a new benchmark and lightweight RL strategy improve attribution without sacrificing answer accuracy.
-
Model-Adaptive Tool Necessity Reveals the Knowing-Doing Gap in LLM Tool Use
LLMs show a knowing-doing gap in tool use: they often recognize when tools are needed via internal states but fail to translate that into actual tool calls, with mismatches of 26-54% on arithmetic and factual tasks.
-
Logical Consistency as a Bridge: Improving LLM Hallucination Detection via Label Constraint Modeling between Responses and Self-Judgments
LaaB improves LLM hallucination detection by mapping self-judgment labels back into neural feature space and using mutual learning under logical consistency constraints between responses and meta-judgments.