Quintessence potential decreases monotonically with redshift while kinetic energy crosses zero near z=1, with negative values at intermediate redshifts being statistical artifacts from derivative reconstruction.
Model Independent Tests of Cosmic Growth vs Expansion
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
abstract
We use Gaussian Processes to map the expansion history of the universe in a model independent manner from the Union2.1 supernovae data and then apply these reconstructed results to solve for the growth history. By comparing this to BOSS and WiggleZ large scale structure data we examine whether growth is determined wholly by expansion, with the measured gravitational growth index testing gravity without assuming a model for dark energy. A further model independent analysis looks for redshift dependent deviations of growth from the general relativity solution without assuming the growth index form. Both approaches give results consistent with general relativity.
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
astro-ph.CO 2verdicts
CONDITIONAL 2roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
Extended analysis of DESI DR2 data confirms robust evidence for dynamical dark energy with phantom crossing preference, stable under parametric and non-parametric modeling.
citing papers explorer
-
Model-Independent Reconstruction of Quintessence Potential and Kinetic Energy from DESI DR2 and Pantheon+ Supernovae
Quintessence potential decreases monotonically with redshift while kinetic energy crosses zero near z=1, with negative values at intermediate redshifts being statistical artifacts from derivative reconstruction.
-
Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements
Extended analysis of DESI DR2 data confirms robust evidence for dynamical dark energy with phantom crossing preference, stable under parametric and non-parametric modeling.