Bayesian ideal point model applied to 341k Debate.org votes finds conviction drives personal freedom topics while conformity drives moral conviction topics including abortion, gun rights, and global warming.
Aramovich and Brad L
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Empirical analysis of social media discussions shows anti-conformity: individuals match the majority's judgment valence but diverge in stance, with rising persuasive language after group exposure.
citing papers explorer
-
Disentangling conviction and conformity: a Bayesian ideal point model of voting behaviour in online debates
Bayesian ideal point model applied to 341k Debate.org votes finds conviction drives personal freedom topics while conformity drives moral conviction topics including abortion, gun rights, and global warming.
-
Influence of the majority group on individual judgments in online spontaneous conversations
Empirical analysis of social media discussions shows anti-conformity: individuals match the majority's judgment valence but diverge in stance, with rising persuasive language after group exposure.