Reference change · event page

Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature

Published notice on a work cited in the Pith corpus. Exact quotes below. No model judges whether any citation was load-bearing.

This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.

Correction Crossref 1 open · 1 total · 0 disputed

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797
Notice DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001151
Event date: 2021-03-05
Machine twin: JSON

01One-hop citing occurrences

Correction Open

A simple model suggesting economically rational sample-size choice drives irreproducibility

ref [11] · 1908.08702 · notice #10079 · dispute

Raw extraction · bibliography line

Szucs D, Ioannidis JPA. Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. PLOS Biology. 2017;15(3):e2000797. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797

Status lifecycle on notices: open → disputed → (response attached on the notice page). Repaired counts matter as much as open counts. There is no “safe,” “invalid,” or “resolved” badge.