Citation notice #7635 · 2026-07-11 11:51:01.370040+00:00
Illusions of the Gold Standard: A Large-scale Analysis of Human Evaluation Protocols for Long-form Text Generation
cites The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials , journal =, which carries a correction notice dated 2019-09-12. One-hop deterministic notice: the citation edge exists in the Pith bibliography graph; no model judged whether the citation was load-bearing.
Citing paper Cited paper on Pith Event page Original DOI Notice DOI File a formal challenge All reference changes
01Evidence
Raw extraction · bibliography line · bibliography index 99
Matthew Michelson and Katja Reuter , keywords =. The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials , journal =. 2019 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443 , url =
Parser render (TeX stripped for reading; raw above is the evidence)
Matthew Michelson and Katja Reuter, keywords =. The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials, journal =. 2019, issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443, url =
02Event
- Type
- Correction
- Source
- Crossref
- Original DOI
- 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443
- Notice DOI
- 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100450
- Date
- 2019-09-12
- Title
- Corrigendum to “The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials” [Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 16 (2019) 100443]
- Reasons
- ['Erratum']
- Work
- The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials , journal = (2019) Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
03Dispute this notice
If this citation does not depend on the flagged claim, or the event is wrong, say so. Disputes are public. For a signed challenge against the paper itself, use the formal challenge form.