Erratum: Propagation Effects on the Breakdown of a Linear Amplifier Model: Complex-Mass Schrodinger Equation Driven by the Square of a Gaussian Field
classification
🧮 math-ph
math.MP
keywords
belowentireequationfunctioninequalitymathbbaboveaccording
read the original abstract
The proof of the inequality $\lambda_{q}(x,t)\le (q\mu_{x,t} -0^+)^{-1}$ [p 750, below Eq. (29)] is based on the statement that ${\cal E}(x,t;s)$ is an entire function of $s\in {\mathbb C}^M$ [see below Eq. (30)]. But according to Equation (9) and Lemma 1, all we know is that ${\cal E}(x,t;s)$ is an entire function of $k(s)\in {\mathbb R}^N$. Nevertheless, the above inequality holds, hence the proposition 1.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.