pith. sign in

arxiv: 0711.1742 · v2 · submitted 2007-11-12 · 🌌 astro-ph · hep-th· physics.atom-ph

In response to the comments by Murphy et al. (arxiv:0708.3677)

classification 🌌 astro-ph hep-thphysics.atom-ph
keywords murphyprocedurealphaarxivdifferencesfittingprevioussystems
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In their comment, Murphy et al. (arxiv:0708.3677) criticize the fitting procedure we used in two previous papers [Srianand et al. 2004(Paper I) and Chand et al. 2004 (Paper II)] and conclude that the above papers offers no stringent test to previous evidence for varying fine structure constant. We think this is a hasty conclusion as (a) our procedure is robust as shown in Paper II; (b) the data used by Murphy et al., in particular the error array, are different from ours and there are differences in the fitting procedure; (c) despite these differences, 70 per cent of their individual measurements are consistent with that quoted in Paper II. Our reanalysis using VPFIT with identical initial guess parameters leads to \Delta\alpha/\alpha = (0.01+/-0.15)x 10^{-5}$ for 21 systems (excluding two systems that deviate at more than 3$\sigma$ level) with very little scatter (\chi^2_\nu ~1).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.