pith. sign in

arxiv: 0711.4154 · v1 · pith:H3GKHELVnew · submitted 2007-11-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Skyrmion versus vortex flux lattices in p-wave superconductors

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords skyrmionlatticelatticesp-wavephasesuperconductorsvortexfield
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

p-wave superconductors allow for topological defects known as skyrmions, in addition to the usual vortices that are possible in both s-wave and p-wave materials. In strongly type-II superconductors in a magnetic field, a skyrmion flux lattice yields a lower free energy than the Abrikosov flux lattice of vortices, and should thus be realized in p-wave superconductors. We analytically calculate the energy per skyrmion, which agrees very well with numerical results. From this, we obtain the magnetic induction B as a function of the external magnetic field H, and the elastic constants of the skyrmion lattice, near the lower critical field H_c1. Together with the Lindemann criterion, these results suffice to predict the melting curve of the skyrmion lattice. We find a striking difference in the melting curves of vortex lattices and skyrmion lattices: while the former is separated at all temperatures from the Meissner phase by a vortex liquid phase, the skyrmion lattice phase shares a direct boundary with the Meissner phase. That is, skyrmions lattices never melt near Hc1, while vortex lattices always melt sufficiently close to Hc1. This allows for a very simple test for the existence of a skyrmion lattice. Possible muSR experiments to detect skyrmion lattices are also discussed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.