Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bullseye: Structured Passage Retrieval and Document Highlighting for Scholarly Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1406.1875 v1 pith:6OT7QHYH submitted 2014-06-07 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords bullseyedocumenteffectivenessuserpassagepassagesscholarlysearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the Bullseye system for scholarly search. Given a collection of research papers, Bullseye: 1) identifies relevant passages using any on-the-shelf algorithm; 2) automatically detects document structure and restricts retrieved passages to user-specifed sections; and 3) highlights those passages for each PDF document retrieved. We evaluate Bullseye with regard to three aspects: system effectiveness, user effectiveness, and user effort. In a system-blind evaluation, users were asked to compare passage retrieval using Bullseye vs. a baseline which ignores document structure, in regard to four types of graded assessments. Results show modest improvement in system effectiveness while both user effectiveness and user effort show substantial improvement. Users also report very strong demand for passage highlighting in scholarly search across both systems considered.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools