Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Who Is Guilty?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1603.08549 v1 pith:DNQYCRE2 submitted 2016-03-23 math.HO

Benjamin Chen , Ezra Erives , Leon Fan , Michael Gerovitch , Jonathan Hsu , Tanya Khovanova , Neil Malur , Ashwin Padaki
show 4 more authors
Nastia Polina Will Sun Jacob Tan Andrew The
This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.HO
keywords guiltyallowedcasedeviatediscussgeneralizationliarslogic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We discuss a generalization of logic puzzles in which truth-tellers and liars are allowed to deviate from their pattern in case of one particular question: "Are you guilty?"

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools