Reply to L.Vaidman's comment on "Asking photons where they have been in plain language"
classification
🪐 quant-ph
keywords
amplitudesvaidmananalysisaskingbeencommentconfusionconnection
read the original abstract
Vaidman's analysis of the photon's past is based on incorrect interpretation of quantum probability amplitudes. The confusion stems from his original work [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{60}, 1351 (1988)], which missed the connection between the amplitudes and the "weak values" introduced therein.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.