Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Ranking and Cooperation in Real-World Complex Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.06611 v1 pith:HOTM3SR5 submitted 2019-01-20 cs.SI

classification cs.SI
keywords rankingpeoplecooperationexpertsnetworksnodealgorithmscomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

People participate and activate in online social networks and thus tremendous amount of network data is generated; data regarding their interactions, interests and activities. Some people search for specific questions through online social platforms such as forums and they may receive a suitable response via experts. To categorize people as experts and to evaluate their willingness to cooperate, one can use ranking and cooperation problems from complex networks. In this paper, we investigate classical ranking algorithms besides the prisoner dilemma game to simulate cooperation and defection of agents. We compute the correlation among the node rank and node cooperativity via three strategies. The first strategy is involved in node level; however, other strategies are calculated regarding neighborhood of nodes. We find out correlations among specific ranking algorithms and cooperativtiy of nodes. Our observations may be applied to estimate the propensity of people (experts) to cooperate in future based on their ranking values.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools